| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i5-1335U


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1335U is 1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
b06a3
Core
Skylake-SP
Raptor Lake-U
Architecture
Skylake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/12
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2017
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
282.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
37.94k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
26.18k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
13.86k (x3.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
14.48k (x2.13)
TOTAL
45.82k
92.46k (x2.02)

Multithread

4110

i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
125.7k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
93.63k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
46.18k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
16.75k (x1.77)
TOTAL
281.48k
282.25k (x1)

Performance/W
4110
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
18817 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4