Xeon X3430 vs Core i7-8750H
Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 35.5 k points while the i7-8750H gets 52.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.5 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 35.5 k points while the i7-8750H gets 52.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.5 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
906ea
Core
Lynnfield
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
October 2009
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
15.74k points
53.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.66k points
231.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
X3430
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1.75k
3.01k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
3.95k
11.68k (x2.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.29k
3.78k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.66k
5.64k (x2.13)
TOTAL
10.65k
24.12k (x2.27)
Multithread
X3430
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.81k
7.4k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
15.37k
29.99k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
9.66k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.42k
5.12k (x1.16)
TOTAL
35.49k
52.18k (x1.47)
Performance/W
X3430
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
72 points/W
165 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
162 points/W
667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94 points/W
215 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
374 points/W
1160 points/W
Performance/GHz
X3430
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
623 points/GHz
734 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/GHz
2850 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
820 points/GHz
922 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
948 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
TOTAL
3802 points/GHz
5883 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4