| | | | | | |

Xeon W3550 vs Core i5-6400


Description
The W3550 is based on architecture while the i5-6400 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the i5-6400 gets 129.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6400 is 1.8 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
506e3
Core
Bloomfield
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/4
TDP
130 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2009
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
20.24k points
48.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.21k points
174.05k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W3550
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
3.2k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
5.21k
12.81k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.31k
4.18k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
4.3k (x1.39)
TOTAL
13.92k
24.49k (x1.76)

Multithread

W3550

i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
8.75k
11.45k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
19.8k
46.67k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.38k
14.69k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.17k
5.92k (x0.96)
TOTAL
47.09k
78.73k (x1.67)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3550
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
8.34k
11.56k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
5.56k
16.53k (x2.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
4.3k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
3.97k (x1.29)
TOTAL
20.24k
36.36k (x1.8)

Multithread

W3550

i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
32.5k
43.01k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
64.46k (x2.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.85k
16.14k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
5.91k (x0.94)
TOTAL
73.21k
129.51k (x1.77)

Performance/W
W3550
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
250 points/W
662 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
992 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99 points/W
248 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
1992 points/W

Performance/GHz
W3550
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
2502 points/GHz
3503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
5009 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
978 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
925 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
TOTAL
6073 points/GHz
11018 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4