| | | | | | |

Xeon W3550 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The W3550 is based on architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3550 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.1 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
100fa0
Core
Bloomfield
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4 /4
6/6
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2009
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
20.24k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.21k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W3550
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
1.98k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
5.21k
4.57k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.31k
2.57k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
3.51k (x1.14)
TOTAL
13.92k
12.64k (x0.91)

Multithread

W3550

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.75k
11.86k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
19.8k
27.4k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.38k
15.39k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.17k
3.46k (x0.56)
TOTAL
47.09k
58.11k (x1.23)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3550
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.34k
5.17k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
5.56k
5.33k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
2.76k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
3.51k (x1.14)
TOTAL
20.24k
16.77k (x0.83)

Multithread

W3550

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
32.5k
29.82k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
21.59k
30.79k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.85k
15.88k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
3.69k (x0.59)
TOTAL
73.21k
80.19k (x1.1)

Performance/W
W3550
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
250 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
W3550
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2502 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
978 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
925 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
6073 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4