Xeon W3520 vs Pentium 4405U
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 4405U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the 4405U gets 51.1 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.4 times faster than the 4405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the 4405U gets 51.1 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.4 times faster than the 4405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
406e3
Core
Nehalem-WS
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2/4
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
23.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
51.1k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
4405U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
7.45k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
10.51k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
2.78k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
2.59k (x0.92)
TOTAL
17.96k
23.33k (x1.3)
Multithread
W3520
4405U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
16.1k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
25.44k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
6.99k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
2.58k (x0.41)
TOTAL
73.16k
51.1k (x0.7)
Performance/W
W3520
4405U
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
466 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
3407 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
4405U
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
1324 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
1232 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
11109 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4