Xeon E5502 vs E3-1230 v5
Description
The E5502 is based on Nehalem architecture while the E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 1.7 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 1.7 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
506e3
Core
Gainestown
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
1.867 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.867 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/8
TDP
80 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2009
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
11.3k points
9.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.28k points
37.88k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5502
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
4.76k
2.59k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
3.15k
3.94k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
1k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
2k (x1.37)
TOTAL
11.3k
9.52k (x0.84)
Multithread
E5502
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
9.48k
10.4k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
6.3k
16.64k (x2.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
4.51k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.64k
6.33k (x2.4)
TOTAL
22.28k
37.88k (x1.7)
Performance/W
E5502
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
118 points/W
130 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
79 points/W
208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48 points/W
56 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
278 points/W
474 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5502
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/GHz
681 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1685 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1038 points/GHz
263 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
779 points/GHz
525 points/GHz
TOTAL
6051 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4