Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i9-10980XE
Description
The E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2690 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2690 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
50657
Core
Haswell-EP
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
12/24
18/36
TDP
135 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
25344 kB
Date
September 2014
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
40.71k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
1016.36k points
1241.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2690 v3
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
20.96k
29.53k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
11.74k
22.59k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
5.99k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
10.22k (x3.01)
TOTAL
40.71k
68.33k (x1.68)
Multithread
E5-2690 v3
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
531.68k
587.06k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
342.28k
496.41k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133.22k
134.66k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.19k
22.99k (x2.5)
TOTAL
1016.36k
1241.12k (x1.22)
Performance/W
E5-2690 v3
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3938 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2535 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
7529 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 v3
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
5988 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3356 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1318 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
971 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
11632 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4