Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i7-4500U
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i7-4500U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i7-4500U gets 53.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.5 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i7-4500U gets 53.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.5 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
40651
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
8 /16
2 /2
TDP
135 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2012
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
33.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
66.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
10.41k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
8.97k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
3.82k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
3.39k (x1.02)
TOTAL
23.28k
26.59k (x1.14)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
19.91k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
21.47k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
8.53k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.53k (x0.91)
TOTAL
185.26k
53.44k (x0.29)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
1327 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
1431 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
569 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
3563 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
8863 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4