Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i5-8500
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-8500 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-8500 gets 232.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8500 is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-8500 gets 232.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8500 is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
906ea
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8 /16
6/6
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
9216 kB
Date
March 2012
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
69.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
307.52k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
15.21k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
22.94k (x3.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
5.54k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
11.39k (x3.43)
TOTAL
23.28k
55.07k (x2.37)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
79.52k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
107.78k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
31.89k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
13.37k (x3.45)
TOTAL
185.26k
232.55k (x1.26)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
1223 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
1658 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
206 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
3578 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3709 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
5595 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
13433 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4