Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Pentium E6600
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the E6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 325.8 k points while the E6600 gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 11.1 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 325.8 k points while the E6600 gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 11.1 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
1067a
Core
Haswell-EP
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/2
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
kB
Date
September 2014
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
16.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
29.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
3.57k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
7.85k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
3.14k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
1.58k (x0.48)
TOTAL
27.11k
16.14k (x0.6)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
6.99k (x0.05)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
14.66k (x0.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
6.09k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
1.66k (x0.25)
TOTAL
325.78k
29.4k (x0.09)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/W
108 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1112 points/W
226 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
94 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
26 points/W
TOTAL
2715 points/W
452 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
3573 points/GHz
1163 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3087 points/GHz
2561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1027 points/GHz
1023 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1059 points/GHz
516 points/GHz
TOTAL
8745 points/GHz
5263 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4