| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs W3550


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the W3550 is based on .

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 325.8 k points while the W3550 gets 73.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 4.5 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
106a5
Core
Haswell-EP
Bloomfield
Architecture
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
12/24
4 /4
TDP
120 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
20.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
73.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
2.3k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
5.21k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
3.31k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
3.09k (x0.99)
TOTAL
18.17k
13.92k (x0.77)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
8.75k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
19.8k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
12.38k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
6.17k (x0.65)
TOTAL
182.59k
47.09k (x0.26)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
8.34k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
5.56k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
3.26k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
3.08k (x0.94)
TOTAL
27.11k
20.24k (x0.75)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
32.5k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
21.59k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
12.85k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
6.27k (x0.94)
TOTAL
325.78k
73.21k (x0.22)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/W
250 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1112 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
99 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
2715 points/W
563 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3573 points/GHz
2502 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3087 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1027 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1059 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
TOTAL
8745 points/GHz
6073 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4