| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs E5-2680 v2


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 338.7 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 1.6 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
306e4
Core
Haswell-EP
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
12/24
10 /20
TDP
120 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
25600 kB
Date
September 2014
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
551.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
11.96k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
10.73k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
4.59k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
4.31k (x1.31)
TOTAL
27.11k
31.6k (x1.17)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
218.24k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
206.92k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
100.37k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
11.45k (x1.72)
TOTAL
325.78k
536.99k (x1.65)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
10.55k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
10.02k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
3.99k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
3.66k (x1.17)
TOTAL
27.57k
28.23k (x1.02)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
215.04k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
230.43k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
96.87k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
8.76k (x1.3)
TOTAL
338.73k
551.1k (x1.63)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1211 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
380 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
2823 points/W
4792 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3607 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3245 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1007 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
8894 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4