Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Pentium Gold 5405U
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 325.8 k points while the 5405U gets 48.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 6.7 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 325.8 k points while the 5405U gets 48.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 6.7 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
806eb
Core
Haswell-EP
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2048 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
21.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
48.83k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
7.01k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
9.51k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
2.31k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
2.52k (x0.77)
TOTAL
27.11k
21.34k (x0.79)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
16.03k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
24.11k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
5.59k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
3.1k (x0.47)
TOTAL
325.78k
48.83k (x0.15)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/W
1069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1112 points/W
1607 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
372 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
207 points/W
TOTAL
2715 points/W
3255 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
3573 points/GHz
3046 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3087 points/GHz
4134 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1027 points/GHz
1004 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1059 points/GHz
1094 points/GHz
TOTAL
8745 points/GHz
9278 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4