Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i7-9750H
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.6 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.6 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
906ed
Core
Haswell-EP
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
120 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
276.46k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
4.53k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
18.24k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
5.76k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
13.01k (x4.16)
TOTAL
18.17k
41.54k (x2.29)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
24.3k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
97.88k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
29.85k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
11.93k (x1.25)
TOTAL
182.59k
163.95k (x0.9)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
16.32k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
23.42k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
6.04k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
13.24k (x4.03)
TOTAL
27.11k
59.03k (x2.18)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
86.92k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
126.14k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
29.62k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
11.86k (x1.78)
TOTAL
325.78k
254.54k (x0.78)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
16.31k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
24.48k (x2.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
5.87k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
13.02k (x4.17)
TOTAL
27.57k
59.67k (x2.16)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
87.54k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
131.05k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
28.47k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
11.8k (x1.75)
TOTAL
338.73k
258.87k (x0.76)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
25.22k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
21.97k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
5.02k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
10.71k (x3.28)
TOTAL
36.41k
62.92k (x1.73)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
125.56k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
115.86k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
25.63k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
9.4k (x1.4)
TOTAL
452.9k
276.46k (x0.61)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
6144 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4