Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i5-3330
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-3330 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 338.7 k points while the i5-3330 gets 104.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 3.2 times faster than the i5-3330 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 338.7 k points while the i5-3330 gets 104.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 3.2 times faster than the i5-3330 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
306a9
Core
Haswell-EP
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/4
TDP
120 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2014
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
29.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
104.78k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
10.85k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
10.47k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
4.21k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
4.31k (x1.38)
TOTAL
27.57k
29.84k (x1.08)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
41.77k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
40.2k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
16.11k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
6.7k (x0.99)
TOTAL
338.73k
104.78k (x0.31)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
542 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1211 points/W
522 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
380 points/W
209 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
2823 points/W
1361 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
3607 points/GHz
3390 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3245 points/GHz
3272 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1007 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
TOTAL
8894 points/GHz
9325 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4