| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i5-3320M


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 338.7 k points while the i5-3320M gets 58.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 5.8 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
306a9
Core
Haswell-EP
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/4
TDP
120 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2014
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
29.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
58.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
3.21k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
9.05k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
3.94k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
3.93k (x1.26)
TOTAL
18.17k
20.13k (x1.11)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
6.08k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
19.02k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
8.85k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
3.98k (x0.42)
TOTAL
182.59k
37.93k (x0.21)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
10.89k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
9.77k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
3.98k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
3.77k (x1.15)
TOTAL
27.11k
28.4k (x1.05)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
20.23k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
20.83k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
9.49k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
4.04k (x0.61)
TOTAL
325.78k
54.6k (x0.17)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
10.64k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
10.53k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
4.07k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
3.97k (x1.27)
TOTAL
27.57k
29.22k (x1.06)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
21.27k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
23.93k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
9.48k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
4.12k (x0.61)
TOTAL
338.73k
58.81k (x0.17)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
608 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1211 points/W
684 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
380 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
2823 points/W
1680 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3607 points/GHz
3225 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3245 points/GHz
3191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/GHz
1234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1007 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
TOTAL
8894 points/GHz
8853 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4