| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i5-2520M


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-2520M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 338.7 k points while the i5-2520M gets 50.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 6.7 times faster than the i5-2520M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
206a7
Core
Haswell-EP
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/2
TDP
120 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2014
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
24.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
50.23k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
2.69k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
7.28k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
3.84k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
3.05k (x0.98)
TOTAL
18.17k
16.86k (x0.93)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
6.08k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
16.15k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
8.87k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
3.06k (x0.32)
TOTAL
182.59k
34.15k (x0.19)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
9.04k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
8.03k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
4.06k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
2.99k (x0.96)
TOTAL
27.57k
24.13k (x0.88)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
19.82k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
18.12k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
9.23k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
3.06k (x0.45)
TOTAL
338.73k
50.23k (x0.15)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1211 points/W
518 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
380 points/W
264 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
88 points/W
TOTAL
2823 points/W
1435 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
3607 points/GHz
2826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3245 points/GHz
2510 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1007 points/GHz
935 points/GHz
TOTAL
8894 points/GHz
7540 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4