Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i5-2500K
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-2500K is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 338.7 k points while the i5-2500K gets 111.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 3 times faster than the i5-2500K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 338.7 k points while the i5-2500K gets 111.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 3 times faster than the i5-2500K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
206a7
Core
Haswell-EP
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/4
TDP
120 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
32.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
111.83k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
11.84k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
10.43k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
5.22k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
5.36k (x1.72)
TOTAL
27.57k
32.85k (x1.19)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
45.51k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
40.83k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
20.7k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
4.79k (x0.71)
TOTAL
338.73k
111.83k (x0.33)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
479 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1211 points/W
430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
380 points/W
218 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
2823 points/W
1177 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
3607 points/GHz
3200 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3245 points/GHz
2818 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1007 points/GHz
1449 points/GHz
TOTAL
8894 points/GHz
8878 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4