Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i5-10500T
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0653
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
120 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
302.13k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
3.87k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
15.79k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
5.1k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
12.13k (x3.88)
TOTAL
18.17k
36.89k (x2.03)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
22.17k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
101.79k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
34.13k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
3.74k (x0.39)
TOTAL
182.59k
161.83k (x0.89)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
13.94k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
20.01k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
5.34k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
11.41k (x3.47)
TOTAL
27.11k
50.7k (x1.87)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
82.18k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
124.23k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
35.6k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
3.73k (x0.56)
TOTAL
325.78k
245.75k (x0.75)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
14.01k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
21.17k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
5.21k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
11.42k (x3.66)
TOTAL
27.57k
51.82k (x1.88)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
82.38k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
115.64k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
32.22k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
3.71k (x0.55)
TOTAL
338.73k
233.94k (x0.69)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
25.16k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
22.28k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
5.18k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
11.97k (x3.67)
TOTAL
36.41k
64.6k (x1.77)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
144.86k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
120.98k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
32.55k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
3.73k (x0.56)
TOTAL
452.9k
302.13k (x0.67)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
8632 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4