Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Celeron N5100
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the N5100 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 325.8 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 3.6 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 325.8 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 3.6 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
906c0
Core
Haswell-EP
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/4
TDP
120 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
26.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
89.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
9.74k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
9.84k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
3.89k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
3.51k (x1.07)
TOTAL
27.11k
26.98k (x1)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
34.19k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
36.28k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
15.3k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
4.05k (x0.61)
TOTAL
325.78k
89.82k (x0.28)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/W
5699 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1112 points/W
6047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
2550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
674 points/W
TOTAL
2715 points/W
14970 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
3573 points/GHz
3479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3087 points/GHz
3514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1027 points/GHz
1389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1059 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
8745 points/GHz
9637 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4