| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Celeron J4105


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 325.8 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 5.3 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
706a1
Core
Haswell-EP
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/4
TDP
120 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2014
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
1.68k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
5.29k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
2.75k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
3.44k (x1.1)
TOTAL
18.17k
13.16k (x0.72)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
6.39k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
20.02k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
10.22k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
4.94k (x0.52)
TOTAL
182.59k
41.57k (x0.23)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
4.9k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
7.26k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
2.75k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
3.32k (x1.01)
TOTAL
27.11k
18.22k (x0.67)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
18.84k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
27.45k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
10.35k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
4.85k (x0.73)
TOTAL
325.78k
61.49k (x0.19)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1112 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
2715 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3573 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3087 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1027 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1059 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
8745 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4