| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.6 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
806d0
Core
Haswell-EP
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
120 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2014
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
709.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
4.4k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
20.25k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
11.69k (x4.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
11.66k (x3.73)
TOTAL
18.17k
48.01k (x2.64)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
38.93k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
191.89k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
108.8k (x3.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
14.95k (x1.57)
TOTAL
182.59k
354.57k (x1.94)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
15.22k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
25.2k (x2.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
12.66k (x3.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
11.66k (x3.55)
TOTAL
27.11k
64.74k (x2.39)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
155.37k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
260.27k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
115.37k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
20.04k (x3.01)
TOTAL
325.78k
551.04k (x1.69)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
17.25k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
25.53k (x2.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
12.56k (x3.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
11.4k (x3.65)
TOTAL
27.57k
66.74k (x2.42)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
144.5k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
243.41k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
109.02k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
16k (x2.37)
TOTAL
338.73k
512.94k (x1.51)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
30.84k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
26.38k (x2.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
12.66k (x3.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
11.74k (x3.6)
TOTAL
36.41k
81.62k (x2.24)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
294.86k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
280.92k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
113.9k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
20.16k (x3.01)
TOTAL
452.9k
709.85k (x1.57)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4