| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
800f11
Core
Haswell-EP
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
13.95k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
22.02k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
5.17k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
16.61k (x5.32)
TOTAL
27.57k
57.75k (x2.09)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
120.59k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
197.34k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
56.83k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
6.41k (x0.95)
TOTAL
338.73k
381.16k (x1.13)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
12.65k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
20.95k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
4.63k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
14.47k (x4.44)
TOTAL
36.41k
52.69k (x1.45)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
101.78k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
177.57k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
47.18k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
6.78k (x1.01)
TOTAL
452.9k
333.31k (x0.74)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4