Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.7 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.7 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
810f81
Core
Haswell-EP
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/4
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
3.89k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
17.94k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
5.34k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
6.62k (x2.11)
TOTAL
18.17k
33.79k (x1.86)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
15.07k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
66.84k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
19.56k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
6.54k (x0.69)
TOTAL
182.59k
108.01k (x0.59)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
14.3k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
21.69k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
5.42k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
6.6k (x2.01)
TOTAL
27.11k
48k (x1.77)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
55.45k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
83.13k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
20.76k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
6.58k (x0.99)
TOTAL
325.78k
165.91k (x0.51)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
13.05k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
22.88k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
5.39k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
7.31k (x2.34)
TOTAL
27.57k
48.63k (x1.76)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
51.73k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
87.74k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
20.74k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
6.57k (x0.97)
TOTAL
338.73k
166.79k (x0.49)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
14.48k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
23.84k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
5.43k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
5.46k (x1.67)
TOTAL
36.41k
49.21k (x1.35)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
54.39k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
88.77k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
20.04k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
5.48k (x0.82)
TOTAL
452.9k
168.69k (x0.37)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4