Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs FX 9590
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 338.7 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.5 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 338.7 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.5 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
600f20
Core
Haswell-EP
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/8
TDP
120 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
137.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
11.51k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
9.57k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
4.19k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
7.14k (x2.29)
TOTAL
27.57k
32.41k (x1.18)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
55.13k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
51.69k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
27.02k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
3.81k (x0.56)
TOTAL
338.73k
137.65k (x0.41)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1211 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
380 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
2823 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3607 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3245 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1007 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
8894 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4