Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i7-12700H
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
906a3
Core
Haswell-EP
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
12/24
14/20
TDP
120 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
93.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
643.29k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
7.95k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
19.74k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
13.29k (x4.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
14.97k (x4.78)
TOTAL
18.17k
55.95k (x3.08)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
53.64k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
171.15k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
94.92k (x2.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
9.24k (x0.97)
TOTAL
182.59k
328.95k (x1.8)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
24.26k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
24.03k (x2.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
14.75k (x4.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
12.08k (x3.68)
TOTAL
27.11k
75.12k (x2.77)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
199.99k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
218.01k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
102.62k (x2.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
9.42k (x1.42)
TOTAL
325.78k
530.04k (x1.63)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
25.81k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
26.18k (x2.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
14.71k (x4.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
13.88k (x4.44)
TOTAL
27.57k
80.58k (x2.92)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
203.61k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
249.64k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
101.32k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
9.55k (x1.41)
TOTAL
338.73k
564.12k (x1.67)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
41.64k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
25.48k (x2.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
13.2k (x3.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
12.8k (x3.93)
TOTAL
36.41k
93.12k (x2.56)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
276.56k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
251.6k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
104.55k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
10.58k (x1.58)
TOTAL
452.9k
643.29k (x1.42)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
2188 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
5594 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
8859 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5422 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
2808 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
2724 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
19813 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4