Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
90675
Core
Haswell-EP
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
120 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
399.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
7.43k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
18.64k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
13.15k (x4.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
14.82k (x4.73)
TOTAL
18.17k
54.04k (x2.97)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
36.23k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
134.76k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
84.06k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
16.71k (x1.75)
TOTAL
182.59k
271.76k (x1.49)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
24.18k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
23.85k (x2.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
14.42k (x4.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
14.87k (x4.53)
TOTAL
27.11k
77.32k (x2.85)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
122.98k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
168.77k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
96.11k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
16.32k (x2.45)
TOTAL
325.78k
404.19k (x1.24)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
24.24k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
24.74k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
13.95k (x4.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
14.47k (x4.64)
TOTAL
27.57k
77.41k (x2.81)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
126.87k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
186.48k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
92.37k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
15.45k (x2.29)
TOTAL
338.73k
421.18k (x1.24)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
33.85k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
20.33k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
10.51k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
11.77k (x3.61)
TOTAL
36.41k
76.46k (x2.1)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
174.21k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
141.31k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
64.86k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
19.01k (x2.84)
TOTAL
452.9k
399.39k (x0.88)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4