Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i5-1235U
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
906a4
Core
Haswell-EP
Alder Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
10/12
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
297.46k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
7.33k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
18.27k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
12.8k (x4.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
13.2k (x4.22)
TOTAL
18.17k
51.61k (x2.84)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
29.24k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
83.32k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
54.53k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
4.99k (x0.52)
TOTAL
182.59k
172.07k (x0.94)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
23.53k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
23.51k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
14.71k (x4.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
13.24k (x4.03)
TOTAL
27.11k
74.99k (x2.77)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
106.07k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
115.88k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
60.53k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
5.88k (x0.88)
TOTAL
325.78k
288.36k (x0.89)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
23.03k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
24.11k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
13.9k (x4.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
12.11k (x3.88)
TOTAL
27.57k
73.15k (x2.65)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
111.78k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
124.18k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
59.87k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
5.76k (x0.85)
TOTAL
338.73k
301.58k (x0.89)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
36.73k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
22.09k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
11.24k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
11.58k (x3.55)
TOTAL
36.41k
81.64k (x2.24)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
130.18k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
110.21k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
50.76k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
6.31k (x0.94)
TOTAL
452.9k
297.46k (x0.66)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
19831 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4