Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i3-12100T
Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
90675
Core
Haswell-EP
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
120 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
330.62k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
6.88k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
17.36k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
12.26k (x4.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
13.49k (x4.31)
TOTAL
18.17k
49.98k (x2.75)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
22.03k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
84.16k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
46.49k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
8.96k (x0.94)
TOTAL
182.59k
161.65k (x0.89)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
22.39k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
22.29k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
13.37k (x4.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
13.72k (x4.18)
TOTAL
27.11k
71.76k (x2.65)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
76.69k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
104.06k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
53.2k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
8.86k (x1.33)
TOTAL
325.78k
242.81k (x0.75)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
22.25k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
23.16k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
13.09k (x4.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
13.21k (x4.23)
TOTAL
27.57k
71.7k (x2.6)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
77.43k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
109.08k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
52.45k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
8.75k (x1.3)
TOTAL
338.73k
247.71k (x0.73)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
43.24k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
23.76k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
12.67k (x3.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
13.88k (x4.26)
TOTAL
36.41k
93.54k (x2.57)
Multithread
E5-2670 v3
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
150.28k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
126.29k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
45.32k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
8.73k (x1.3)
TOTAL
452.9k
330.62k (x0.73)
Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
9446 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4