| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i7-11700


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i7-11700 gets 729 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 1.6 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0671
Core
Haswell-EP
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
98.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
728.98k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
5.48k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
20.99k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
12.58k (x4.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
21.24k (x6.78)
TOTAL
18.17k
60.28k (x3.32)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
44.15k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
196.6k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
102.57k (x2.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
10.64k (x1.12)
TOTAL
182.59k
353.96k (x1.94)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
18.05k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
26.13k (x2.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
13.92k (x4.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
21.22k (x6.46)
TOTAL
27.11k
79.32k (x2.93)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
160.49k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
225.25k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
113.88k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
10.64k (x1.6)
TOTAL
325.78k
510.25k (x1.57)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
18.96k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
28.34k (x2.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
13.26k (x4.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
20.2k (x6.47)
TOTAL
27.57k
80.76k (x2.93)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
164.31k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
253.96k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
115.28k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
10.65k (x1.58)
TOTAL
338.73k
544.2k (x1.61)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
35.12k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
29.24k (x2.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
12.56k (x3.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
21.95k (x6.73)
TOTAL
36.41k
98.87k (x2.72)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
304k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
304.7k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
109.64k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
10.64k (x1.59)
TOTAL
452.9k
728.98k (x1.61)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
4677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
4688 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
11215 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
7168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
2563 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
20177 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4