| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i7-1165G7


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.2 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
806c1
Core
Haswell-EP
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
120 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
210.4k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
4.26k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
19.54k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
10.95k (x3.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
11.08k (x3.54)
TOTAL
18.17k
45.84k (x2.52)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
15.69k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
68.3k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
33.66k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
12.16k (x1.28)
TOTAL
182.59k
129.81k (x0.71)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
14.48k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
24.18k (x2.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
11.95k (x3.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
11.01k (x3.35)
TOTAL
27.11k
61.62k (x2.27)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
50.98k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
80.7k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
36.61k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
12.02k (x1.81)
TOTAL
325.78k
180.32k (x0.55)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
16.27k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
25.74k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
11.5k (x3.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
10.82k (x3.46)
TOTAL
27.57k
64.32k (x2.33)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
54k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
88.76k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
35.23k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
12.14k (x1.8)
TOTAL
338.73k
190.12k (x0.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
22.97k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
21.61k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
8.99k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
8.52k (x2.61)
TOTAL
36.41k
62.1k (x1.71)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
82.75k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
86.58k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
29.34k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
11.72k (x1.75)
TOTAL
452.9k
210.4k (x0.46)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4