| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i5-11400T


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 182.6 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.7 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0671
Core
Haswell-EP
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
120 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
31.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
67.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
3.51k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
14.2k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
7.63k (x2.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
6.06k (x1.93)
TOTAL
18.17k
31.39k (x1.73)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
7.4k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
31.37k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
18.11k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
10.23k (x1.07)
TOTAL
182.59k
67.1k (x0.37)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
272 points/W
211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
876 points/W
896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
293 points/W
518 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
292 points/W
TOTAL
1522 points/W
1917 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1136 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2801 points/GHz
3838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
914 points/GHz
2062 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1010 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
TOTAL
5861 points/GHz
8485 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4