| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Core i5-1135G7


Description
The E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2670 v3 gets a score of 452.9 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 238.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
806c1
Core
Haswell-EP
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
120 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.41k points
68.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
452.9k points
238.87k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3.52k
3.75k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
8.68k
17.28k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
9.5k (x3.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
8.81k (x2.82)
TOTAL
18.17k
39.34k (x2.17)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
32.7k
12.43k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
105.18k
54.95k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.18k
26.41k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
7.38k (x0.77)
TOTAL
182.59k
101.16k (x0.55)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
13.43k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
22.29k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
11.18k (x3.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
9.75k (x2.97)
TOTAL
27.11k
56.64k (x2.09)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
139.07k
40.24k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
133.47k
65.99k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.6k
28.51k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.65k
6.66k (x1)
TOTAL
325.78k
141.4k (x0.43)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
11.18k
15.12k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
23.4k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
10.9k (x3.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
9.41k (x3.01)
TOTAL
27.57k
58.83k (x2.13)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
140.98k
45.69k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
145.37k
74.42k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.62k
29.8k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.75k
7.16k (x1.06)
TOTAL
338.73k
157.08k (x0.46)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2670 v3
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
18.62k
25.96k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
10.49k
23.42k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
10.1k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
8.71k (x2.67)
TOTAL
36.41k
68.19k (x1.87)

Multithread

E5-2670 v3

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
236.25k
94.88k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
151.05k
99.81k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58.9k
33.6k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
10.58k (x1.58)
TOTAL
452.9k
238.87k (x0.53)

Performance/W
E5-2670 v3
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1969 points/W
3389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/W
3565 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
491 points/W
1200 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
378 points/W
TOTAL
3774 points/W
8531 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2670 v3
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6006 points/GHz
6180 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3385 points/GHz
5576 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1303 points/GHz
2405 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1052 points/GHz
2075 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
16235 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4