| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs Core i5-1335U


Description
The E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2667 v3 gets a score of 343.6 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
b06a3
Core
Haswell-EP
Raptor Lake-U
Architecture
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/12
TDP
135 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
41.36k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
343.64k points
282.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2667 v3
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
37.94k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
11.9k
26.18k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
13.86k (x2.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
14.48k (x3.86)
TOTAL
41.36k
92.46k (x2.24)

Multithread

E5-2667 v3

i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
172.62k
125.7k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
110.03k
93.63k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.06k
46.18k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.93k
16.75k (x0.99)
TOTAL
343.64k
282.25k (x0.82)

Performance/W
E5-2667 v3
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
1279 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
815 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
326 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
2545 points/W
18817 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2667 v3
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
5830 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3305 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1311 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1043 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
11489 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4