| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Core i5-1135G7


Description
The E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2660 v2 gets a score of 459.3 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 157.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 2.9 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
806c1
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
10 /20
4/8
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2013
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
19.48k points
68.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
459.31k points
238.87k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2660 v2
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
7.26k
15.12k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
23.4k (x3.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.77k
10.9k (x3.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
9.41k (x3.69)
TOTAL
19.48k
58.83k (x3.02)

Multithread

E5-2660 v2

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
45.69k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
191.43k
74.42k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.22k
29.8k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.46k
7.16k (x0.96)
TOTAL
459.31k
157.08k (x0.34)

Performance/W
E5-2660 v2
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1897 points/W
1632 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2015 points/W
2658 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
844 points/W
1064 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
256 points/W
TOTAL
4835 points/W
5610 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2660 v2
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2420 points/GHz
3600 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2302 points/GHz
5571 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
923 points/GHz
2595 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
2242 points/GHz
TOTAL
6495 points/GHz
14007 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4