| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Silver 4208


Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
50657
Core
Broadwell-EP
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
85 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
11264 kB
Date
March 2016
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
311.57k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
2.59k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
7.55k
9.5k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
3.15k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
5.9k (x2.91)
TOTAL
14.79k
21.13k (x1.43)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
17.41k
21.09k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
75.46k
80.93k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.25k
30.76k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
8.51k (x1.83)
TOTAL
123.78k
141.3k (x1.14)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
16.86k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
12.08k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
3.37k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
6.29k (x2.62)
TOTAL
29.39k
38.61k (x1.31)

Multithread

E5-2620 v4

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
150.99k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
118.54k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
33.44k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
8.6k (x1.52)
TOTAL
237.83k
311.57k (x1.31)

Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
3666 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4