Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Core i7-4500U
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i7-4500U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i7-4500U gets 66.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 237.8 k points while the i7-4500U gets 66.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
40651
Core
Broadwell-EP
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
8/16
2 /2
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2016
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
33.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
66.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
3.31k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
7.55k
8.37k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.61k
3.68k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
3.34k (x1.65)
TOTAL
14.79k
18.71k (x1.26)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.41k
5.21k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
75.46k
18.54k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.25k
7.8k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
3.54k (x0.76)
TOTAL
123.78k
35.09k (x0.28)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.22k
10.2k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
12.06k
9.23k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
3.89k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.89k
3.29k (x1.14)
TOTAL
27.18k
26.61k (x0.98)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
61.34k
19.2k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
90.21k
19.02k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.2k
8.31k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
3.22k (x0.7)
TOTAL
182.37k
49.75k (x0.27)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
10.41k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
8.97k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
3.82k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.41k
3.39k (x1.41)
TOTAL
21.37k
26.59k (x1.24)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.51k
19.91k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
75.12k
21.47k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
8.53k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
3.53k (x0.65)
TOTAL
147.8k
53.44k (x0.36)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.16k
16.67k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
9k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
3.75k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
3.6k (x1.5)
TOTAL
29.39k
33.02k (x1.12)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.77k
31.77k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
102.28k
21.36k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.13k
7.95k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.65k
5.06k (x0.9)
TOTAL
237.83k
66.14k (x0.28)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1221 points/W
2118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
1424 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
530 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
338 points/W
TOTAL
2798 points/W
4410 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4054 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
3001 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
799 points/GHz
1199 points/GHz
TOTAL
9798 points/GHz
11008 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4