Xeon E5-2620 vs Core i5-12500H
Description
The E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i5-12500H gets 201.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i5-12500H gets 201.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
906a3
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2012
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
18.8k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
224.7k points
225.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
21.11k (x3.04)
Test#2 (FP)
6.24k
19.61k (x3.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
9.53k (x3.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
7.72k (x3.01)
TOTAL
18.8k
57.97k (x3.08)
Multithread
E5-2620
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
90.01k
61.44k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
82.43k
93.66k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.59k
40.09k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.66k
6.01k (x0.62)
TOTAL
224.7k
201.2k (x0.9)
Performance/W
E5-2620
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/W
1365 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
868 points/W
2081 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
448 points/W
891 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
134 points/W
TOTAL
2365 points/W
4471 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
2780 points/GHz
4692 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2494 points/GHz
4357 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1024 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
7519 points/GHz
12883 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4