| | | | | | |

Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs Core i7-4720HQ


Description
The E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1230 v5 gets a score of 25.5 k points while the i7-4720HQ gets 71.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4720HQ is 2.8 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306c3
Core
Skylake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
80 W
47 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2015
January 2015
Mean monothread perf.
9.52k points
40.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.88k points
132.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3-1230 v5
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
0.7k
3.79k (x5.44)
Test#2 (FP)
2.8k
9.64k (x3.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.85k
4.34k (x5.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.88k
3.76k (x2)
TOTAL
6.23k
21.53k (x3.45)

Multithread

E3-1230 v5

i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2.74k
11.66k (x4.26)
Test#2 (FP)
12.87k
37.71k (x2.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
16.38k (x4.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.03k
5.94k (x0.99)
TOTAL
25.52k
71.69k (x2.81)

Performance/W
E3-1230 v5
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
34 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
161 points/W
802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
49 points/W
348 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
75 points/W
126 points/W
TOTAL
319 points/W
1525 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3-1230 v5
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
183 points/GHz
1053 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
738 points/GHz
2677 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/GHz
1206 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
496 points/GHz
1044 points/GHz
TOTAL
1640 points/GHz
5980 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4