Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i7-4600U
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-4600U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i7-4600U gets 64.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 3.3 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i7-4600U gets 64.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 3.3 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
40651
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Haswell
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2020
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
28.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
64.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
14.37k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
8.31k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
3.35k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
2.96k (x0.58)
TOTAL
31.52k
28.98k (x0.92)
Multithread
3206R
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
31.32k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
20.17k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
8.02k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
5.03k (x1.03)
TOTAL
216.02k
64.55k (x0.3)
Performance/W
3206R
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
535 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
336 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
4303 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
4353 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
896 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
8781 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4