| | | | | | |

Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i5-8250U


Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i5-8250U gets 153.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806ea
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2020
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
53.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
153.5k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
3.32k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
13.5k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
4.11k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
7.42k (x1.53)
TOTAL
17.32k
28.34k (x1.64)

Multithread

3206R

i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
13.97k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
50.8k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
14.71k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
4.76k (x0.92)
TOTAL
103.77k
84.24k (x0.81)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
22k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
19.55k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
4.41k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
7.83k (x1.54)
TOTAL
31.52k
53.8k (x1.71)

Multithread

3206R

i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
70.15k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
63.27k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
15.29k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
4.8k (x0.98)
TOTAL
216.02k
153.5k (x0.71)

Performance/W
3206R
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
4676 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
4218 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
1019 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
320 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
10233 points/W

Performance/GHz
3206R
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
6471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
5750 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
2304 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
15823 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4