Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Ryzen 3 3300U
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3300U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 3300U gets 139.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.5 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 3300U gets 139.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.5 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
810f81
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
40.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
139.56k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
12k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
19.55k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
4.43k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
4.83k (x0.95)
TOTAL
31.52k
40.81k (x1.29)
Multithread
3206R
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
43.64k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
73.99k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
17.03k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
4.91k (x1)
TOTAL
216.02k
139.56k (x0.65)
Performance/W
3206R
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
2909 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
4933 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
1135 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
327 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
9304 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
5587 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1266 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
1379 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
11661 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4