| | | | | | |

Pentium G645 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The G645 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G645 gets a score of 35.4 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 325.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 9.2 times faster than the G645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
306f2
Core
Sandy Bridge
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
12/24
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2012
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
22.24k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.38k points
452.9k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G645
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8.66k
11.08k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
9.57k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.48k
3.18k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
3.28k (x1.03)
TOTAL
22.24k
27.11k (x1.22)

Multithread

G645

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
14.06k
139.07k (x9.89)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
133.47k (x11.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.83k
46.6k (x8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
6.65k (x1.8)
TOTAL
35.38k
325.78k (x9.21)

Performance/W
G645
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
216 points/W
1159 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
182 points/W
1112 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
90 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
544 points/W
2715 points/W

Performance/GHz
G645
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2987 points/GHz
3573 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2380 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1199 points/GHz
1027 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1103 points/GHz
1059 points/GHz
TOTAL
7669 points/GHz
8745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4