| | | | | | |

Pentium G645 vs Core i5-10500T


Description
The G645 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G645 gets a score of 35.4 k points while the i5-10500T gets 245.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 6.9 times faster than the G645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
a0653
Core
Sandy Bridge
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/12
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2012
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
22.24k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.38k points
302.13k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G645
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.66k
13.94k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
20.01k (x2.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.48k
5.34k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
11.41k (x3.56)
TOTAL
22.24k
50.7k (x2.28)

Multithread

G645

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.06k
82.18k (x5.85)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
124.23k (x10.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.83k
35.6k (x6.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
3.73k (x1.01)
TOTAL
35.38k
245.75k (x6.95)

Performance/W
G645
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
216 points/W
2348 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
182 points/W
3550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
90 points/W
1017 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
544 points/W
7021 points/W

Performance/GHz
G645
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2987 points/GHz
3669 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2380 points/GHz
5267 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1199 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1103 points/GHz
3002 points/GHz
TOTAL
7669 points/GHz
13341 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4