| | | | | | |

Pentium G4560 vs Core i3-9100T


Description
The G4560 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i3-9100T gets 145.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.6 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
906eb
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
54 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
192.88k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
13.74k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
19.7k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
4.86k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
8.61k (x1.16)
TOTAL
44.21k
46.91k (x1.06)

Multithread

G4560

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
50.5k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
72.58k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
18.09k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
4.28k (x0.6)
TOTAL
89.91k
145.45k (x1.62)

Performance/W
G4560
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
1443 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
2074 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
517 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
122 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
4156 points/W

Performance/GHz
G4560
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
3713 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5325 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
2327 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
12678 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4