Pentium G3260 vs Core i3-6100U
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-6100U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i3-6100U gets 50.2 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i3-6100U gets 50.2 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
406e3
Core
Haswell
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
53 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
30.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
69.94k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
7.99k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
11.82k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
2.97k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.75k (x0.98)
TOTAL
30.56k
26.52k (x0.87)
Multithread
G3260
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
15.44k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
23.79k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
6.93k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
4.03k (x0.62)
TOTAL
58.89k
50.19k (x0.85)
Performance/W
G3260
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
1029 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
1586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
462 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
3346 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
3474 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
5137 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
11532 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4