Pentium 4417U vs Core i5-1035G4
Description
The 4417U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 2.1 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 2.1 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
706e5
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
24.49k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.15k points
142.69k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4417U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.94k
7.07k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
11.35k
10.55k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
5.27k (x2.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
5.66k (x2.02)
TOTAL
24.49k
28.56k (x1.17)
Multithread
4417U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
25.28k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
37.48k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.49k
17.77k (x3.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
6.92k (x2.81)
TOTAL
41.15k
87.45k (x2.13)
Performance/W
4417U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/W
1685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1407 points/W
2499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
1185 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
461 points/W
TOTAL
2743 points/W
5830 points/W
Performance/GHz
4417U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3452 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4937 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1041 points/GHz
1424 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1217 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
10646 points/GHz
7718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4