| | | | | | |

Pentium 4415U vs Xeon Silver 4208


Description
The 4415U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 36.2 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 141.3 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 3.9 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
50657
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
27.39k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
56.39k points
311.57k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4415U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.59k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
9.5k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
3.15k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
5.9k (x2.28)
TOTAL
17.49k
21.13k (x1.21)

Multithread

4415U

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
21.09k (x4.48)
Test#2 (FP)
21.73k
80.93k (x3.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.35k
30.76k (x4.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
8.51k (x3.5)
TOTAL
36.22k
141.3k (x3.9)

Performance/W
4415U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1449 points/W
952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
490 points/W
362 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
2415 points/W
1662 points/W

Performance/GHz
4415U
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
1017 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4136 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1124 points/GHz
1843 points/GHz
TOTAL
7603 points/GHz
6604 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4