Pentium 4415U vs Xeon E5-2680 v2
Description
The 4415U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 56.4 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 537 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 9.5 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 56.4 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 537 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 9.5 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
306e4
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
10 /20
TDP
15 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
25600 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
27.39k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
56.39k points
551.1k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4415U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
11.96k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
10.73k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.09k
4.59k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
4.31k (x1.03)
TOTAL
27.39k
31.6k (x1.15)
Multithread
4415U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
17.24k
218.24k (x12.66)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
206.92k (x7.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.44k
100.37k (x13.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
11.45k (x2.66)
TOTAL
56.39k
536.99k (x9.52)
Performance/W
4415U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1149 points/W
1898 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1827 points/W
1799 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
496 points/W
873 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
3759 points/W
4669 points/W
Performance/GHz
4415U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3605 points/GHz
3323 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5140 points/GHz
2982 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1344 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1819 points/GHz
1197 points/GHz
TOTAL
11908 points/GHz
8777 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4