Core i9-9900KF vs i9-11900H
Description
The i9-9900KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900KF gets a score of 592.9 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900KF is 1 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900KF gets a score of 592.9 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900KF is 1 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
806d1
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2019
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
84.54k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
592.86k points
584.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900KF
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.03k
33.38k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
29.52k
27.12k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.55k
11.69k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
17k (x1.1)
TOTAL
84.54k
89.19k (x1.05)
Multithread
i9-9900KF
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
276.22k
249.83k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
250.61k
237.26k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
57.2k
84.18k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.84k
13.2k (x1.49)
TOTAL
592.86k
584.47k (x0.99)
Performance/W
i9-9900KF
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
2908 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2638 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
6241 points/W
12988 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9900KF
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
6605 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1309 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3090 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
16909 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4